I receive an inconvenient number of magazines. The stack sits in the bathroom 2 feet high, waiting to be recycled. I didn't even order all of these titles... several are replacements for original titles that are no longer published (yet I had a paid up subscription). I didn't even get to choose the replacements. I have different views on the value of said magazines so I thought I'd review.
Glamour - one of the aforementioned replacement subscriptions for the defunct Jane magazine. I first read Jane while "enjoying" London-Heathrow for an extended period of time and was smitten. Sure it was a fashion mag but it had an irreverence that appealed to me. Glamour as a replacement is a joke. They rarely get taken out of the plastic anymore. It's all 20 ways to nab a guy, the perfect smokey eye or 5 exercises for a flat stomach and frankly I don't give a shit about any of that garbage writing. While I do love fashion photography and clothes and especially handbags, I heed Baz Luhrman's advice and "don't read beauty magazines, they'll only make you feel ugly". (Wikipedia assures me that I had a choice in my Jane replacement including Vanity Fair but I was given no such choice. VF would have been preferable to the badness that is Glamour.)
US Weekly - replaced my Premiere subscription. I am a movie afficianado. Us Weekly is a horrific gossip rag. What the hell were they thinking by using it as a replacement? Another that goes straight to the recycling pile unread. Jessica Simpson's latest meal does not interest me in the slightest. Thanks for killing the trees you idiot lie mongers. (Wikipedia says on this one that I could have received my money back, funny I didn't get any notice of how to do that.)
Rachel Ray - a replacement for Bon Appetit, which felt like a bait & switch because Bon Appetit is still going strong. As far as replacements go it's less offensive than the Premiere to Us Weekly substitution but it's still kind of like being invited out to dinner at Michael Mina and instead going to Chili's. I like RR as a person and TV host but frankly most of her recipes suck. Well they aren't bad per se, they're just uninspiring and simple. I can cook better dishes on my own without a recipe.
Paula Deen - Having been raised in The South I love, love, love Paula's recipes. But that much butter can kill you, yo.
Rolling Stone - another replacement but I can't remember what it replaced. I am not a music buff. Sure I like music but Micah routinely trips me up with questions like "who sings this song?" (more often than not the answer is Dio.) RS unlike Glamour though, does have high points: the feature writing. I LOVE reading their indepth articles. I wish they made a version of the mag that was nothing but the features and skipped all the rock stars doing bad things gossip. I still reference (in my head if not in casual conversation) their pieces on the War on Drugs and the evil of Goldman Sachs (or Dick Cheney). Ethan Hawke's treatment on Kris Kristoferson finally thawed my "team Uma" alliance. It's no wonder I'm sucked into things like "Generation Kill". Good fucking writing boys (and gals). It must suck to be stuck on the non-feature side of the writing staff. RS, do more features. They remind me of why I wanted to be a journalist 20 years ago.
Entertainment Weekly - I'll admit I only have a subscription for this mag because when the Twilight issue came out last spring, every teeny-bopper in my sleepy little town beat me to the punch. Ended up being a good buy. I usually read or at least skim it. Sometimes I like it more than others, all depending on the subjects. I LOVE Diablo Cody's turns at oped. I LOATHE Stephen King's (Mark Harris usually falls somewhere in the middle for me). I crack up at the Hit List and the Bullseye. This week's VAMPIRES issue was awesome, it would have been perfect if they'd subbed in Alexandar for Stephen on the cover. (Gooo team Eric!)
Cards and Scrapbooking - two separate subscriptions published by the same company. Coming in at $80 a piece for a years subscription (each!) they are great idea books for when you need a creative muse. The photography is excellent, the advertising is minimal (and yet somehow more annoying because it's bunched together rather than strewn throughout). My first year's subscription was excellent quality-- printed on thick cardstock that will easily last years (and are kept, not recycled). I actually sent them the DO NOT RENEW notification and they auto-renewed me anyway. I sent back a written inquiry as to why they auto-renewed me when I'd followed their instructions to opt out but I've not heard anything back. Then I received this month's editions and they're printed on flimsy, considerably thinner, way too glossy paper. I'm not a happy camper. I may have to escalate my protest in the next few days.
Parents - a gift from MelissaFro. I peruse but since a lot of the info isn't yet pertinent to my life, my interest is lukewarm. Some months I'll be honest, I can't bring myself to flip through them. But since they are chock full of good info that I'll need at some point in the future, I keep them.
My postal delivery person must hate trying to cram all those mags into my tiny mailbox every month.